REISSUED: 2008
GENRE: Fiction/Historical Romance
SETTING: England, early 1800s
SERIES: Web, #3
AUTHOR SITE: link
MY GRADE: D
SYNOPSIS: The last time Madeline Raine had seen James Purnell, she had been but a chit of a girl, and at his mercy. Purnell had held her helpless in his arms, but protectively, above the abyss of her own dangerous hunger for him. He had left her then, not taking her innocence but taking her heart, as he vanished from England. Since then Madeline had reigned as society's most dazzling and heartless beauty, making all men pay for one man's rebuff of her.
Now James was back, more handsome and arrogant than ever. And Madeline steeled herself not to fall under his spell again. But she soon discovered that the melting power of passion ignited by love would not easily die...
MY THOUGHTS: After owning this book for twelve years I finally got around to reading it. The first half of this book was extremely boring. It involved so many characters, mostly relatives, parties, and conversations that had nothing to do with anything. That carried on throughout the book. It's truly at least 100 pages longer than it should have been and it was a real struggle to get though the first half. All the interesting things involving Madeline and James took place in the second half, so that made the story so much more tolerable.
James is thirty. He left England for Canada (where the author lives) four years previous. He works with fur traders. He sales home to England and brings along the daughter, Jean Cameron, of the man he works with. She ends up getting married to someone she meets there then disappears from the story. He's reacquainted with our heroine, twenty-five-year-old Madeline, which he met, to my understanding, in both previous book in this series. They have history together but we don't know about any of it.
James and his younger sister Alex grew up with very religious parents and weren't allowed to socialize much with other children. Alex is married to Madeline's twin brother, Dominic. Both of his parents are horrible and look down at James both for his career choice and for his past, which involved a girl they didn't approve of, Dora. That relationship has haunted him for ten years but he gets resolution after meeting up with her. Her brother, Carl Beasley, was a bad character who would have made one helluva villain.
He and Madeline are in love with each other but they don't know it. In love but can't stand one another. We aren't told why that is so it's very confusing. He's possessive and jealous because he knows how flirtatious she is. She's got a very smart mouth and is very immature and slightly antagonistic, even when he's being nice and trying hard to get along. Her attitude is common for heroines written at that time (1990) and before. We didn't get any background information on her at all or any about their history with each other from four years before.
Now about the "rape." There's a sex scene that happens after she tells him that if they have sex it will be rape, since she can't stand him. I've read that scene five times and don't see rape in it even though the hero admits to himself that it was rape. The heroine even thinks it was rape. Here are the pages for you to read that scene for yourself. In the last chapter, James realizes it wasn't rape and later in said chapter asks Madeline about it and she agrees that it wasn't. So why did they both say it was rape if an actual rape didn't happen? How could they have seen it that way? More importantly, why did the author write it that way?
This could have been a really good story if not for most of the first half and the excessive amount of characters in here, and the two weddings of secondary characters. No story needs three weddings in it. I love reading about tragic couples, which this one was, and I did enjoy most the second half. I probably only liked a total of 1/3 of the story. It's a shame it was bogged down with so much unnecessary dialogue.
The heroine's name, Madeline Raine, sounds like the 1986 Bruce Hornsby single Mandoline Rain. I wonder if that's a coincidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment